The case against god, but also far more systematic. Perhaps the most difficult issue concerning the relation between morality and. Put simply the existence of bad or evil things isnt hard to explain for nontheistshuman beings and the world are imperfectbut they are hard to explain for classical theists. Mackies evil and omnipotence, he argues against the existence of god. Analyse the implications of mackies views on the problem. A new logical problem of evil the blackwell companion to.
And yet evil 2 plainly exists, and indeed most theists in other contexts stress its existence more than that of evil 1. There seems to be some contradiction between these. The problem of evil as the problem of pain matthew m. The problem of evil is an extensive topic that cannot be examined in full in this paper, given its limited space. The argument from evil is vulnerable to mackies challenge. The problem of evil is an issue that is entirely too overlooked and dismissed by most christians.
The theistic concept of god as supremely powerful, intelligent, and good makes the problem very difficult because such a being, it would seem, would make a much better world than this one. Apphil b stephen bedeau 214332449 dennis vasilis papadopoulos december 3, 2015 word count. The problem of evil according to mackie and the efficacy of. In the omnipotnce of this essay, we will examine some theistic responses to the logical problem of evil that do not require the abandonment of any central tenet of theism. His discussion of each is intended to make clear the reasons for which they fail to address the real problem. Although he admits that these solutions work up to a point, mackie describes them as halfhearted because, he argues, they dont take the idea of evil seriously enough. Recent work on the problem of evil analysis oxford. The problem of evil until 1996, the consensus in the scholarly world was that the problem of evil, as proffered by john mackie in 1955, had been summarily answered since the publication of alvin plantingas free will defense in 1974. It does so by producing a new problem entirely distinct from the old problem of epicurus, hume, and mackie, which was so influentially addressed by plantinga. Mackies, evil and omnipotence and other kinds of academic papers in our essays database at many essays. Mackies evil and omnipotence in evil and omnipotence j. Mackie s evil and omnipotence essay 1652 words 7 pages j. Rowe, the problem of evil and some varieties of atheism, american philosophical quarterly 16 october 1979. This would include malevolence, cruelty, callousness, cowardice, and states in which good 1 is decreasing and evil 1 increasing.
The problem of evil, in the sense in which i shall be using the phrase, is a problem only for someone who believes that there is a god who is. Plantingas argument is a defense against the logical problem of evil as formulated by the philosopher j. Logical problem of evil internet encyclopedia of philosophy. The only major omission is mackie s failure to address logical inconsistencies in god s supposed attributes, other than the problem of. Some chapters are easier than others for the layman to understand.
L mackie utilizes philosophical analysis to address the problem of evil. One version of this problem includes animal suffering from natural evil, such as the violence and fear faced by animals from predators, natural disasters, over the history of evolution. A good place to begin is with a schematic representation of the. If nothing we know contradicts j, and if gods existence and the truth of j are logically compatible with the existence of evil, then mackies argument fails. His analysis was presented by the following facts for a syllogism or formula. In a widely discussed piece entitled evil and omnipotence john mackie repeats this claim. Mackie thinks that this implies a restriction on gods omnipotence. A critique of the free will defense, a comprehensive look at. Mackie says that a solution to this problem of evil is to either believe that god is not omnipotent, god is not absolutely good, or believe that evil is only an illusion. Mackies version of the logical problem of evil is a failure, as even he came to recognize.
Mackie argues that if an omnipotent and morally perfect god exists, why then is there so much evil in this world. The problem, in short, is that any axiological formulation of the argument from evil, as it stands, is incomplete in a crucial respect, since it fails to make explicit how a failure to bring about good states of affairs, or a failure to prevent bad states of affairs, entails that one is acting in a morally wrong way. This chapter shows that the logical problem of evil is far from dead. Our analysis shows clearly the possibility of the existence of a second order evil, an evil 2 contrasting with good 2 as evil 1 contrasts with good 1. Mackie in his argument from evil and omnipotence, brings forth the discussion problem that 1 god is omnipotent. Mackie has proposed the fallacious solutions of the problem. Behind mackie s argument for atheism 1968 words 8 pages mackie in his paper evil and omnipotence, constructs an argument against the idea of the possibility of a god existing that has the characteristics laid out by the main religions. Mackie the subjectivity of values the following excerpt is from mackies the subjectivity of values, originally published in 1977 as the first chapter in his book, ethics. The inaccessibility of reasonswhy seems especially decisive.
Mackie assumed that theists would accept his second premise and reject his first premise. Mackies definition of the problem the problem of evil is god is omnipotent, god is wholly good, and yet evil exists. God is almighty, god is perfectly good, and evil exists. Analysis of j l mackie s evil and omnipotence free essays. The year 1996 was a watershed year in the study of the problem of evil with the publication of the evidential problem of evil. Abstract in seeking to undermine mackies logical argument from evil, plantinga assumes that mackies argument regards it as a necessary truth that a wholly good god would eliminate all evil that he could eliminate. I believe that it is a valid argument to renounce some views that traditional theism sets forward. Phil 376 mackie problem of evil by cody cash on prezi. He asserts this on the grounds that an omnibenevolent god would. The problem of evil 393 since hume, there have been attempts to solve the problem of evil by attacking or reinterpreting one of the first four assumptions.
Human choice and free will posted on december 19, 20 by russia robinson in his article entitled evil and omnipotence, j. The problem of evil by fyodor dostoevsky the inhumanity of man by the way, a bulgarian i met lately in moscow, ivan went on, seeming not to hear his brothers words, told me about the crimes committed. There is such a morally justifying reason, but it is a reason that is beyond our ken, a reason beyond our understanding, and god permits some evil for that morally sufficient reason. He also wrote the miracle of theism 1983 which considers arguments for and against gods existence. If it is a law of causeandeffect that evil has to cause goodness, then omnipotence ought to be able to break this law. This problem makes the existence of a traditional god extremely unlikely, and it makes a belief in one, irrational at best. My view of the problem of evil in mackies article evil and. Omnipotent means allpowerful and that god is capable of anything. This is to say, a being perfect in power, knowledge and goodness does allow evil to exist at the same time. Fallacious solutions explicitly maintain all their propositions, but implicitly end up rejecting at least one of them. Mackies evil and omnipotence evkl, however, it is not possible that god has a morally sufficient reason for allowing evil, then it seems that would be true. Most theists think god created the laws of causality in the first place and miracles are supposed to show god breaking causal laws. God uses evil as a vehicle for bringing about the greater good. The logical form of the argument tries to show a logical impossibility in the coexistence of god and evil, 1 4 while the evidential form tries to show that given the evil in the world, it is improbable that there is an.
In order to do so, he finds a statement that could make the claim a reasonable one and makes an addition of a necessarily true proposition to mackies. According to those theists, god has the following three properties. The problem of evil has also been extended beyond human suffering, to include suffering of animals from cruelty, disease and evil. From the beginning of mackie s arguement, reason is something that is suspended to sustain belief. The problem of evil is usually seen as the problem of how the existence of god can be reconciled with the existence of evil in the world. The problem of evil is thought to be one of the most difficult for theists. Mackie and lewis the problem of evil mackie the socalled problem of evil is a puzzle arising from many theists conception of the divine. That is, god is allpowerful, allknowing, and allgood. The word omnipotence is defined as a goddeity that is allpowerful, andor has infinite power. In other words, no one does anything evil, so evil does not exist. Problem of evil is secondary to the question of existence. Although he admits that these solutions work up to a point, mackie describes them as halfhearted because, he argues, they dont take the idea of evil seriously eno.
Mackie and mccloskey can be understood as claiming that it is impossible for all of the following statements to be true at the same time. C2 god is either not omniscient, not omnipotent, not omnibenevolent, or nonexistent. Mackie s world is a possible world where all free agents choose to do the morally good action with every choice. If god were allknowing, it seems that god would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world. Mackie presents fallacious solutions that try solving the logical problem of evil.
Mackie on the problem of evil university of notre dame. The problem of evil stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. The problem of evil, in th e sense in w hich i shall be using th e phrase, is a problem only for someone w ho believes th at there is a g od w ho is both om nipotent an d w holly good. My critique of standard approaches to the problem of evil thus seems to reinforce atheologian mackies verdict of positive irrationality for such a religious position. This essay is the first extract in the edexcel philosophy of religion anthology. The problem of evil is often formulated in two forms. He uses the standpoint that god cannot be omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and evil can still exist. For this reason, mackie does not think that they are of any help to the theologian trying to respond to the problem of evil. Mill, for example, suggested a radical weakening of 1 and 2.
Though it seems improbable and odd, it is logically conceivable, so it is, therefore, logically possible. The existence of evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to belief in the existence of a perfect god. Alvin plantingas version of the defense is a famous attempt on the problem of evil. A nd it is a logical problem, th e problem of clarifying an d reconciling a num ber of beliefs. But the theist is not prepared to affirm any of those things. Sep 12, 2009 thus the problem of evil is reduced to the theodicity that this is the best of all possible worlds a quiteliterally ridiculous statement, but not a selfcontradicting one. Why couldnt god have made free creatures who always freely choose the good. Behind mackies argument for atheism 1968 words 123. A wholly good being is opposed to evil in such a way that it eliminates evil as far as it can. Some philosophers see the problem of evil as one belonging to god. I really wouldnt see it as a problem, because evil is a contextual in any perception.
We will explore this view in this essay, but first, let us briefly look at the basic foundation for mackies arguments. If god indeed exists, then there may be other explanations as to why evil exists. In this article, mackie comes to the logical conclusion to the existence of god. It is possible there is no better balance of moral good and moral evil than the one that exists now. Mackie essay the problem of evil solution wont disappoint you with our mackie essay the problem of evil solution high quality of university, college, and high school papers. This implies a restriction on god s power, unless omnipotence doesnt mean.
Review of the problem of evil that this would be the free response of his creatur es, the decision not to reveal himself is for god a form of riskmanagement. Chung phi 2011 2 march 2006 the problem of evil to some evil is necessary for. The problem of evil as a moral objection to theism university of. There seems to be some contradiction between these three propositions, so that if any two of them were true the third would be false. According to incompatibility or logical versions of the problem of evil, e is logically incompatible with gods existence mackie 1955. Schuler abstract the problem of evil arises from the argument that the existence of suffering is incompatible with or else renders improbable the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent god and that, since the former surely exists, the latter must not. Mackie uses the problem of evil to show that belief in an all good god is irrational. How does mackie respond to the objection that evil is necessary as a counterpart to good. Alvin plantingas freewill defense is a logical argument developed by the american analytic philosopher alvin plantinga and published in its final version in his 1977 book god, freedom, and evil. Thus, the evidential problem of evil which is the problem of determining whether and, if so, to what extent the existence of evil constitutes evidence against the existence of god. Even then, mackie continues, there arise religious contradictions when rejecting one of the three ideas. There are, then, quite a num ber of adequate solutions of th e problem of evil, an d som e of these have been adopted, or almost adopted, by various thinkers. Mackie argues that god does not exist because of his idea of the 30god which states that god has to be omniscient, omnipotent and omnibenevolent to fulfill the properties of a true god. Mackies evil and omnipotence essay 1652 words bartleby.
The problem of evil is a problem only for someone who believes that there is a god who is both omnipotent and wholly good 11. Mackie is utilizing the logical problem of evil paradox of omnipotence so, here s the explicit version of mackie s argument. An account of the problem of evil and a consideration of the various objections to the problem. Says that god is not omnipotent and can do what is logically impossible. There are no limits to what an omnipotent being can do. Problem of evil, problem in theology and the philosophy of religion that arises for any view that affirms the following three propositions. My view of the problem of evil in mackies article evil and omnipotence. Inference to the best explanation and the problem of evil. What does mackie mean when he says that there are no objective values. Although our writing service is one of the cheapest you can find, we have been in the business long enough to learn how to maintain a balance between quality, wages, and.
Read this philosophy essay and over 89,000 other research documents. Mackie wrote a very convincing piece on the problem of evil called evil and omnipotence, in which he attempts to show that one of the following premises must be false in order for them to be consistent with each other. Problem of evil 1 problem of evil in the philosophy of religion, the problem of evil is the question of how to reconcile the existence of evil with that of a deity who is omnipotent, omniscient and omnibenevolent see theism. Mackie starts his article by stating the conundrum. In section a, mackie outlines the adequate solutions offered by some religious thinkers.
Has plantinga buried mackies logical argument from evil. We should, therefore, state the problem of evil in terms of second order evil, and against this form of the problem the present solution is useless. The socalled problem of evil is a puzzle arising from many theists conception of the divine. The philosophical problem of evil is the challenge of reconciling belief in god with evil in the world. The problem simply stems from basic beliefs or assumptions pertaining to the attributes of god. That means that believing in e and believing in god is like believing in a fivesided square. In 1955 he published evil and omnipotence which summarized his view that belief in the existence of evil and an allpowerful, allknowing and allgood god be positively irrational. Analyse the implications of mackies views on the problem of evil and suffering. Mackie has proposed the fallacious solutions of the problem of evil and free will are one of them. Philosophy of religion problem of evil flashcards quizlet. Mackie the problem of evil, according to mackie, is that the following set of propositions is inconsistent. In efforts to refute the logical problem of evil, plantinga tries to show that mackies argument is not contradictory.
1469 1186 362 14 257 553 924 942 1106 1407 782 990 317 1368 1204 444 1218 564 864 791 228 872 1416 853 689 133 489 1281 210 724 688 67 1592 29 607 980 1052 213 756 439 744 838 519